Clark conspiracy
WISH YOU may, wish you might, but you won’t have the wish you have for
Clark.
So spake a CIA – civilian in Angeles – of the CIA – the Clark
International Airport. Some cloak-and-dagger credential did indeed obtain in
the CIA, having worked in and retired from naval intelligence. So indulging in
his take of the CIA – the airport, is no waste of intelligence or time.
The CIA as the premier international gateway of the Philippines will never
fly. So he says, with the conviction of Thomas having touched the pierced side
of the Risen Christ.
How so?
America will not allow it. Else it would be deprived of its best
military training facility. You think good old USA will just let go of its
investment in the space shuttle-ready runway at Clark, of the incomparable Crow
Valley for bombing and strafing runs of its warbirds? Nothing comes close to
Clark for the American eagle to sharpen its talons, so to speak.
And, as it was then so it is moreso now with Chinese belligerence in
the Scarborough, er, Panatag Shoal, America’s wish is the Philippine
government’s command.
Opening copy of Punto: Your editorial last Wednesday said it
all, if I may: “For the Philippines to be minimally relied
upon as a US regional partner... it therefore behooves us to resort to all
possible means to build at the very least a most minimal credible defense
posture.”
So appealed Foreign Affairs Secretary Alberto del Rosario del Rosario before his American counterpart in Washington recently.
“We are submitting a list of hardware that the US can help us out with. This would be in terms of patrol vessels, patrol aircraft, radar systems, coast watch stations,” del Rosario furthered.
The Philippines’ wish list included “up to four squadrons (48) of upgraded Lockheed Martin F-16 fighter jets, more well-armed frigates and corvette-size, fast to surface combatant vessels and minesweepers and four to six mini submarines, possibly obtained from Russia.” This according to the Center for a New American Security.
Del Rosario pointed out that while awaiting the new hardware, it is important for the Philippines and the United States to continue to conduct military exercises “in a better way, in more locations, in a more frequent manner.”
VFA all the way! The comeback of the US military bases can’t be far away.”
So appealed Foreign Affairs Secretary Alberto del Rosario del Rosario before his American counterpart in Washington recently.
“We are submitting a list of hardware that the US can help us out with. This would be in terms of patrol vessels, patrol aircraft, radar systems, coast watch stations,” del Rosario furthered.
The Philippines’ wish list included “up to four squadrons (48) of upgraded Lockheed Martin F-16 fighter jets, more well-armed frigates and corvette-size, fast to surface combatant vessels and minesweepers and four to six mini submarines, possibly obtained from Russia.” This according to the Center for a New American Security.
Del Rosario pointed out that while awaiting the new hardware, it is important for the Philippines and the United States to continue to conduct military exercises “in a better way, in more locations, in a more frequent manner.”
VFA all the way! The comeback of the US military bases can’t be far away.”
Actually, there’s no need for the US to re-base its forces here.
Notwithstanding the closure of its base in Okinawa. All that matters – in the
American interest – is unrestricted
access to Clark. Thus, the imperative that it should remain at most a
limited-service airport, as it is now, with a few domestic flights and some
budget carriers.
As told by a spook, the “real plot” of the CIA story – the
ex-operative’s and the airport’s – can never get any spookier than that.
In all appearances there indeed is some sabotage going on at the CIA,
to prevent it from being the international gateway it is destined to be.
The idiotic scheme of only-two-slots open at the immigration counter
no matter the volume of passengers at the CIA terminal can only be designed as
to make anyone damn the airport to kingdom come, and never, ever, to set foot
upon it again.
And as though the resultant delays of flights from that immigration retardation
were not enough to dissuade other airlines to come to Clark, there is the
“terminal illness” afflicting the CIA.
But the cube that served the US Air Force well in its incarnation as
the MAC Terminal of the US Air Force is now and anachronism to commercial air
travel, no matter its refurbishing and renaming to Diosdado Macapagal.
Since 2006,
the Clark International Airport Corp. has bandied different entities it said
were serious – read: moneyed – to develop the CIA, starting with the Philippine
Amusement and Gaming Corp. in partnership with the Manila International Airport
Authority and the Bureau of Immigration pitching in P3 billion for the project.
Then came
for the longest time ALMAL, a subsidiary of the Kuwait mega-developer M.A.
Kharafi, reportedly proffering $1.2 billion.
Thereafter
followed Malaysia’s Bristeel Overseas Ventures Inc. with a reported offer of
$150 million to undertake the immediate expansion of the CIA terminal.
Filipino
firm Philco Aero, and a Korean consortium which name I cannot now recall were
also announced by CIAC.
The last I
heard of the bidders for the CIA was the Metro Pacific Group of mogul Manny V.
Pangilinan which had as component to airport development the establishment of a
frail system using the median or center of the North Luzon Expressway which
Pangilinan also operates.
After all
is said of these million-billion dollar proposals, nothing, absolutely nada, is
done at the terminal. Which really gives cause to the conspiracy theory
believed to be strangling the CIA.
That,
compounded further by reports of the government keen on the development of Poro
Point in San Fernando, La Union as “world class international gateway.”
In the
words of Bases Conversion and Development Authority chair Felicito Payumo:
“Something similar to Changi Airport in Singapore which is a combination of a
commercial shopping mall and an international airport.”
Changi for
Poro Point. Tsugi for Clark.
Enough to
make anyone a conspiracy theorist.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home