Hand job
PONTIUS
PILATE reborn in Oscar S. Rodriguez, three-term mayor of the City of San
Fernando and top honcho of the ruling Liberal Party in his domain, if not in
the whole of Pampanga.
“Oca
washes hands of Edsa-Ato tandem” screamed our front page story of June 27, on
the mayor’s denial of any hand in the reported choice of Councilor Renato “Ato”
Agustin as running mate of Vice Mayor Edwin Santiago in 2013.
Okay,
positively put, and straight from Rodriguez: “Kung totoo man iyon, prerogative ni Edsa iyon as mayoralty candidate (If that is true, (the choice)
is Santiago’s prerogative)…Di ako
nakialam sa pagpili. Kung nakapili na nga ng vice mayor. (I didn’t have any
hand in the choice, if indeed a choice has been made).”
Instead
of tying Santiago’s hands by virtue of his being party chief, Rodriguez gave
him free rein. No Pilate-like ablution there but absolute absolution from any wrongdoing,
aye, from even a minor shortcoming, on the part of Rodriguez.
The
mayor’s statements even highlighted – in the lexicon of the techno times, put
into HD – his long-cultured persona as liberal respecter, indeed, as the very
paladin of free choice, which germinated in his student activist days, matured
in his human-rights lawyering years, and has not stopped blooming since.
So
Punto! got the Edsa-Ato story out of
context and mangled its metaphors?
Not
so fast now for mea culpa and splash
in the next front page some apologetic errata.
From
the perspective of political party principles and praxis, Rodriguez is not
quite right, if not altogether wrong, in giving – even in only allowing – Santiago the prerogative to choose
Agustin, or anyone else for that matter, as his running-mate.
Choice
is not a prerogative, not even a privilege, of the standard bearer.
Choice
is the right, the responsibility, even the duty, of the party in assembly. That
is how party politics works. For one so vocal about his adherence to party
principles, it is shocking how Rodriguez easily missed, or how he most
cavalierly dismissed this.
And
then, Agustin is not even deemed as through-thick-and-thin party man, having
won his council seat either in opposition to the Rodriguez-Santiago line-up or
as independent candidate.
Again,
that comprises violation of party principles of rewarding loyalty to, and
upholding the equity of the party member. So, is there no true-blue Oca-Edsa
loyalist that can fill the bill of vice mayor for 2013?
Alas,
why do I keep harping on principles here? It was not so long ago – for me to
forget – that I wrote of principled politics as an oxymoron, aye, a
contradiction in terms mutually exclusive and diametrically opposed.
For in politics, “no one acts on principles or reasons
from them.”
To further appropriate the words of the French writer Leroy Beaullieu in the 1890s yet, politicians are “…the vilest and the narrowest of sycophants and courtiers that humanity has ever known; their sole end basely to flatter and develop all popular prejudices, which, for the rest, they but vaguely share, never having consecrated one minute of their lives to reflection and observation.”
To further appropriate the words of the French writer Leroy Beaullieu in the 1890s yet, politicians are “…the vilest and the narrowest of sycophants and courtiers that humanity has ever known; their sole end basely to flatter and develop all popular prejudices, which, for the rest, they but vaguely share, never having consecrated one minute of their lives to reflection and observation.”
That, premised on the generalization arising
from the fixity of our intellectual habits that deems the recurring
characteristic trait of a segment of one species as representative of that
species, if not of the whole genus. In the case at issue, the political animal.
So what’s the difference between a Filipino
politician and dalag? One is a
voracious filth-feeding bottom dweller. The other is a fish. Some joke!
Exigency and expediency, utility and interests – self-serving, vested interests – are the fundamental matters – I could not dare write principles here and desecrate the word – whence politics breeds. No joke!
Exigency and expediency, utility and interests – self-serving, vested interests – are the fundamental matters – I could not dare write principles here and desecrate the word – whence politics breeds. No joke!
So it is most manifest anew with the emergence
of the Edsa-Ato tandem.
As
shocked, but not necessarily awed, “as the next person in the City of San
Fernando” was vice-mayor in-waiting Councilor Jimmy Lazatin
“All
my three terms in office, I have been a team player supporting the Oca-Edsa
team. To this day, that's about eight years now. We have fought together in
election after election side by side, with our principles intact, winning over
and over as a team,” lamented Lazatin, long publicly hailed by Rodriguez
himself as “next vice mayor.”
How
could they junk him now like they do residual garbage to their Lara dumpsite?
“While
I can speculate all I want about the politics that came to play to arrive at
this tandem, I feel that the best way
for anyone to get real answers is from the original Oca-Edsa tandem. They
are in the best position to answer the questions.” Lazatin makes one
romanticist lost in contemporary times. His Old World value of loyalty and
sense of integrity misappreciating, misapprehending, plainly missing the
realities of politics, at its most exigent, at its most expedient.
Subscribing
to higher – not necessarily nobler, indeed, may even be ignoble – interests,
the Edsa-Ato tandem subsumed, nay, subjugated all the express – not necessarily
applied – party principles of loyalty, integrity, honesty, and fair play.
To
win, at any cost. Whatever it takes. To the point of shaking hands with the
devil himself.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home