Roxas, the Absurd
NATTERING NABOBS of
negativism.
Alliteration crafted by
the legendary columnist of the New York
Times Bill Safire (On Language) for
a speech by US Vice President Spiro Agnew hitting the liberal press. (Agnew preceded
his president, Richard Nixon in being driven out of office, but that’s another
story.)
Anyways – especially for
my seminary elder Ronnie Tiotuico, tourism director, who complains of being always driven to
Messrs Webster and Roget by my columns – nattering means chattering; nabob is
originally a term for governor in India under the Mogul Empire but has evolved
to also mean any person of wealth and prominence; and negativism is habitual
attitude of skepticism.
Nattering nabob of
negativism.
Fittingly suiting Interior
and Local Government Secretary Mar Roxas for his seemingly obsessive compulsion
– or should it be compulsive obsession? – to stomp on Pampanga at every jig he
takes.
Blinder than a bat on
anything good about Pampanga. Eyed as a fly on the minutest bad. Roxas is.
Where others – the Japan
International Cooperation Agency and US Agency for International Aid included,
the mogul Manny V. Pangilinan too – see the Clark International Airport as best
option for the country’s premier international gateway, Roxas saw the least
possibility, short-sightedly looking only at the long distance between Metro
Manila and Clark, and the prohibitive cost of building a railway system to span
it.
There, totally blinded to
the fact that distance is best measured not in miles but in travel time. A case
in point: It takes 45 minutes to motor from Balintawak, Quezon City to Clark
spanning over 70 kilometers. It takes some two hours by car from Balintawak to
the Ninoy Aquino International Airport only some 20 kilometers away.
As then head of the
Department of Transportation and Communications, Roxas was all bullish about
the development of other airports in the country, some serviced only by
missionary flights. And, all bullshit about Clark, over which he sat as chairman
of the board of Clark International Airport Corp. Come now, give but one good
thing that went Clark airport’s way during the incumbency of Roxas at CIAC!
Effete corps of impudent
snobs.
Another one from Agnew,
appropriated and appended to Roxas, singularized into effete impudent snob.
Perfect phrase there characterizing his injurious insult of Gov. Lilia Pineda
when he imposed the presence of former Gov. Eddie Panlilio right at the very
presidential table during the regional peace and order council meeting in Clark
last October.
Panlilio was trounced by
Pineda in the 2010 elections. What personality had he even just to attend that
RPOC meeting exclusive to local government units and the police?
Panlilio is the 2013
bofficial bet for Pampanga governor of the Liberal Party which Roxas heads.
Insolence written all over there. And Roxas said he had taken a leave of
absence as LP president so as not to give any impression that he uses the DILG
for partisan purposes? Effete snobbery, if not thick-faced hypocrisy, there
indeed.
Insolently impertinent –
doubly, aye, redundantly, impudent – was Roxas in tagging Pampanga as election
hot spot.
Pampanga is perceptibly,
if not officially, ranked fourth – behind Laguna, Cebu and Cavite – among the
Most Progressive Provinces in the country, and ahead of Pangasinan, Bataan, Davao, Iloilo and Palawan. Go check the web.
To put
Pampanga now in the same league as Abra, Maguindanao, Lanao del Sur, Masbate
and Basilan is the depth of stupidity, the abyss of absurdity, the nadir of
irrationality, that could have only been born from obstinate insolence.
Progress can’t
exist, much less thrive, in unpeace and disorder. A fact that won’t tax the
intellect of the gnat. That Pampanga is progressive makes a clear negation of
its hotspot listing.
We just have
to give it to Roxas, the Absurd.
Absurdier yet is the general silence of political leaders – with the exception of the ever-loquacious Jerry Pelayo, Candaba mayor and president of the Pampanga Mayors League – over Roxas’ damned list.
Absurdier yet is the general silence of political leaders – with the exception of the ever-loquacious Jerry Pelayo, Candaba mayor and president of the Pampanga Mayors League – over Roxas’ damned list.
The LGEs high-dogging it
with their tails between their legs? Or Roxas got their shrivelled balls in his
hands?
I am most specially
concerned with City of San Fernando Mayor Oscar S. Rodriguez, also president of
the League of Cities of the Philippines.
Last time I looked, San
Fernando is still a part of Pampanga. So it is covered by Roxas damning list.
If there is anybody who
should raise the most hell against Roxas, it should be Rodriguez. For how can
the City of San Fernando – hall-of-famer as most business-friendly city in the
country, hall-of-famer in fastest business licensing processes, hall-of-famer
in the Harvard-designed performance governance system and best practices
template for all LGUs, habitat for human excellence, etcetera – be now
consigned to the depth of some backwaters or boondocks ruled by hoods?
Ay, Roxas nga pala is president of Rodriguez’s
party. So party politics – read: exigency and expediency – at play here?
So what happened to
principled politics that Rodriguez supposedly long embodied?
Here I go again, clutching
at straws. Only to be instantly reminded of what I have written time and again of principled politics as an
oxymoron, a contradiction in terms mutually exclusive and diametrically
opposed.
For in politics, “no
one acts on principles or reasons from them.”
To quote further the French writer Leroy Beaullieu in the 1890s yet, politicians are “…the vilest and the narrowest of sycophants and courtiers that humanity has ever known; their sole end basely to flatter and develop all popular prejudices, which, for the rest, they but vaguely share, never having consecrated one minute of their lives to reflection and observation.”
To quote further the French writer Leroy Beaullieu in the 1890s yet, politicians are “…the vilest and the narrowest of sycophants and courtiers that humanity has ever known; their sole end basely to flatter and develop all popular prejudices, which, for the rest, they but vaguely share, never having consecrated one minute of their lives to reflection and observation.”
Absurd. Really,
absurd